MEMORANDUM
DATE April 20, 2011
TO Congestion Management Program Files
FROM Ariel Godwin, CMP Manager
Boston Region MPO Staff
RE Limited-Access Highway Vehicle Occupancy Counts and Traffic Volumes, Summer 2010
This memorandum presents the results of summer 2010 vehicle occupancy counts. Vehicle occupancy count data are collected as part of the Congestion Management Process (CMP) work program. The CMP is an ongoing multimodal MPO program that has been funded (formerly under various other names) by the Boston Region MPO since 1995. The CMP’s tasks include collecting performance data about the region’s transportation system, identifying causes of recurring congestion, and developing recommendations for congestion-reducing strategies that can be implemented through projects funded in the MPO’s Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). In addition, the CMP supports the MPO’s Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) by providing data for needs assessment and recommending strategies for the LRTP. Data collected as part of the CMP can also be used for transportation modeling.
In the fiscal year 2011 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP), the CMP work program was updated to include monitoring of vehicle occupancies. The purpose of this monitoring is to provide data for future HOV system planning and other transportation-demand-management work. The vehicle occupancy counts from general-purpose lanes described in this memo may be particularly useful for HOV system planning. Currently the freeway sections in which data were collected do not have HOV lanes.
Vehicle occupancy data collection took place between June 15 and July 7, 2010, at seven locations:
Data collection took place in the morning (7:00 – 9:00 AM) for inbound traffic (in the direction of downtown Boston) and in the afternoons (4:00 – 6:00 PM) for outbound traffic. Data were collected by MPO staff; each staff member monitored one lane and recorded the number of occupants in each vehicle that passed using a mechanical tally counting board.
Data collection presented some challenges. In particular, a visual assessment of how many people are in a passing vehicle can be challenging depending on factors such as lighting conditions, vehicle speed, and vehicle window tinting. Also, given the limited-access design of freeways and the high speed of traffic, it was difficult to find a safe location, with clear lines of sight, from which to collect data. The safety of the data collectors was a significant factor in the choice of locations. To this end, rest stop locations were sought for observers to park their vehicles and also have a clear sight distance. For four of the seven locations at which data were collected, a MassDOT van was required in order to assure adequate safety.
Because of the difficulty, or in some cases impossibility, of counting the number of occupants inside certain types of vehicles, the following assumptions were made when calculating the average vehicle occupancy numbers:
These assumptions were developed by staff. Although they are not necessarily specific to the locations, it was not possible to develop any more location-specific assumptions for these particular vehicle types.
Figure 1 shows the count locations, as well as the locations of the HOV lanes. Locations are in geographical order clockwise from southeast to north.
Table 1 shows summer 2010 vehicle occupancy data for Route 3 northbound, between exits 15 and 16 in Weymouth.
Table 2 shows summer 2010 vehicle occupancy data for Route 24, at the construction site near the I-93 ramps in Randolph, in the northbound direction.
Table 3 shows summer 2010 vehicle occupancy data for Route 24, at the construction site near the I-93 ramps in Randolph, in the southbound direction.
Table 4 shows summer 2010 vehicle occupancy data for I-90/Mass Turnpike, eastbound, between exits 13 and 14 in Natick.
Table 5 shows summer 2010 vehicle occupancy data for I-95 in Lexington, between exits 30A and 30B, in the northbound direction.
Table 6 shows summer 2010 vehicle occupancy data for I-93 in Wilmington, at the emergency pullout between exits 41 and 42, in the northbound direction.
Table 7 shows summer 2010 vehicle occupancy data for I-93 in Wilmington, at the emergency pullout between exits 41 and 42, in the southbound direction.
Table 8 shows a summary of the results from summer 2010 freeway vehicle-occupancy counts. Route 24 southbound had the highest average weighted vehicle occupancy (1.3), while I-93 southbound had the lowest (1.11).
The slightly higher occupancy counts on Route 3 and Route 24 may be partially explained by the proximity of the count locations to the southern end point of the Southeast Expressway HOV lane. At these locations, it may be assumed that a large proportion of northbound morning traffic was headed toward downtown Boston via the Southeast Expressway. The availability of an HOV lane along the Southeast Expressway may give drivers an incentive to seek higher-occupancy commuting options. The same is true for southbound afternoon traffic on Route 24; a significant proportion of vehicles may have come from the HOV lane.
The same effect was not observed at the I-93 location. Although traffic at this location was headed toward the I-93 North HOV lanes, occupancy here was the lowest (1.11). However, the count location is much farther from the I-93 North HOV lane, and would have captured traffic headed for I-95 as well.
I-93 in the southbound direction also had the highest percentage of single-occupant vehicles (93%), while Route 24 southbound had the lowest (80%). Percentages of two-occupant vehicles were highest at Route 24 southbound (17%), Route 24 northbound (12%), and I-93 northbound (12%), again suggesting HOV lanes have an impact on commuting decisions.
Results from the HOV monitoring performed by staff in the fall of 2010 may reinforce this conclusion (see Appendices 1 and 21). The Southeast Expressway general-purpose lanes and HOV lanes were last monitored from 6:00 AM to 10:00 AM on Tuesday, November 16, 2010. Between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM, the average weighted vehicle occupancy (using the same weightings as were used for the general-purpose freeway occupancy counts described in this memo) was 2.60 for the northbound HOV lanes and 1.09 for the northbound general-purpose lanes. Assuming that both the summer 2010 freeway occupancy counts and the fall 2010 HOV lane occupancy counts represent typical morning traffic, it can be inferred that a substantial number of 2+ person vehicles counted at the Route 3 and Route 24 locations were headed to or from the HOV lanes.
For the counts done on June 29 and July 7, it is possible that holiday-related travel around the weekend of July 4th resulted in higher numbers of high-occupancy vehicles than normal, creating some bias in the data. However, efforts were made to avoid bias by scheduling counts during the middle of the week (Tuesdays and Wednesdays) and at least one day before or after the official holiday weekend.
1 The two appended tables are from the memorandum, “Observed Travel Times, Vehicle Occupancies, and Travel Time Savings: I-93 North and Southeast Expressway High-Occupancy-Vehicle Lanes, Fall 2010” (Central Transportation Planning Staff, December 16, 2010), pp. 6 and 8.
TABLE 1
Route 3 Northbound Vehicle Occupancy Counts
June 15, 2010
7:00 – 9:00 AM
Start Time |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5+ |
Microbus |
Bus |
Police/ |
Not |
Total |
Total |
Average Weighted Vehicle Occupancy |
7:00–8:00 AM |
2,882 |
314 |
28 |
4 |
3 |
9 |
7 |
3 |
9 |
3,259 |
3,916 |
1.20 |
8:00–9:00 AM |
2,352 |
309 |
14 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
11 |
1 |
13 |
2,706 |
3,363 |
1.24 |
TOTAL 7:00–9:00 AM |
5,234 |
623 |
42 |
6 |
3 |
13 |
18 |
4 |
22 |
5,965 |
7,279 |
1.22 |
*Includes motorcycles, unmarked police vehicles, and taxis without passengers. **Includes limousines and other vehicles with blacked-out windows and vehicles for which visibility did not permit an accurate count. ***Assumes vehicle occupancies of 5.5 for 5+ vehicles, 10 for microbus, 25 for bus, and 2 for “Police/Fire/EMT” and “Not Known.” |
TABLE 2
Route 24 Northbound Vehicle Occupancy Counts
July 7, 2010
7:00 – 9:00 AM
Start Time |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5+ |
Microbus |
Bus |
Police/ |
Not |
Total |
Total |
Average Weighted Vehicle Occupancy |
7:00-8:00 AM |
4,003 |
569 |
53 |
8 |
3 |
12 |
9 |
10 |
64 |
4,731 |
5,842 |
1.23 |
8:00-9:00 AM |
3,626 |
559 |
77 |
16 |
5 |
11 |
4 |
10 |
73 |
4,381 |
5,443 |
1.24 |
TOTAL 7:00-9:00 AM |
7,629 |
1,128 |
130 |
24 |
8 |
23 |
13 |
20 |
137 |
9,112 |
11,284 |
1.24 |
TABLE 3
Route 24 Southbound Vehicle Occupancy Counts
June 29, 2010
4:00 – 6:00 PM
Start Time |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5+ |
Microbus |
Bus |
Police/ |
Not |
Total |
Total |
Average Weighted Vehicle Occupancy |
4:00–5:00 PM |
4,419 |
992 |
121 |
27 |
13 |
18 |
5 |
3 |
62 |
5,660 |
7,381 |
1.30 |
5:00–6:00 PM |
4,393 |
839 |
80 |
26 |
1 |
10 |
15 |
3 |
51 |
5,418 |
7,004 |
1.29 |
TOTAL 4:00–6:00 PM |
8,812 |
1,831 |
201 |
53 |
14 |
28 |
20 |
6 |
113 |
11,078 |
14,384 |
1.30 |
TABLE 4
I-90/Mass. Turnpike Eastbound Vehicle Occupancy Counts
June 23, 2010
7:00 – 9:00 AM
Start Time |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5+ |
Microbus |
Bus |
Police/ |
Not |
Total |
Total |
Average Weighted Vehicle Occupancy |
7:00–8:00 AM |
4,369 |
592 |
48 |
8 |
0 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
0 |
5,032 |
5,929 |
1.18 |
8:00–9:00 AM |
3,711 |
401 |
40 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
12 |
5 |
0 |
4,176 |
4,983 |
1.19 |
TOTAL 7:00–9:00 AM |
8,080 |
993 |
88 |
13 |
0 |
6 |
18 |
10 |
0 |
9,208 |
10,912 |
1.19 |
TABLE 5
I-95 Northbound Vehicle Occupancy Counts
June 22, 2010
4:00 – 6:00 PM
Start Time |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5+ |
Microbus |
Bus |
Police/ |
Not |
Total |
Total |
Average Weighted Vehicle Occupancy |
4:00–5:00 PM |
4,704 |
496 |
46 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
1 |
27 |
5,287 |
6,110 |
1.16 |
5:00–6:00 PM |
4,694 |
344 |
15 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
1 |
22 |
5,089 |
5,684 |
1.12 |
TOTAL 4:00–6:00 PM |
9,398 |
840 |
61 |
9 |
0 |
2 |
15 |
2 |
49 |
10,376 |
11,794 |
1.14 |
TABLE 6
I-93 Northbound Vehicle Occupancy Counts
July 7, 2010
4:00 – 6:00 PM
Start Time |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5+ |
Microbus |
Bus |
Police/ |
Not |
Total |
Total |
Average Weighted Vehicle Occupancy |
4:00–5:00 PM |
5,342 |
802 |
65 |
27 |
8 |
32 |
7 |
3 |
112 |
6,398 |
8,018 |
1.25 |
5:00–6:00 PM |
5,362 |
792 |
63 |
16 |
6 |
17 |
6 |
10 |
173 |
6,445 |
7,918 |
1.23 |
TOTAL 4:00–6:00 PM |
10,704 |
1,594 |
128 |
43 |
14 |
49 |
13 |
13 |
285 |
12,843 |
15,936 |
1.24 |
TABLE 7
I-93 Southbound Vehicle Occupancy Counts
June 29, 2010
7:00 – 9:00 AM
Start Time |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5+ |
Microbus |
Bus |
Police/ |
Not |
Total |
Total |
Average Weighted Vehicle Occupancy |
7:00-8:00 AM |
6,085 |
396 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
8 |
3 |
10 |
6,524 |
7,204 |
1.10 |
8:00-9:00 AM |
4,722 |
336 |
27 |
2 |
0 |
8 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
5,106 |
5,654 |
1.11 |
TOTAL 7:00-9:00 AM |
10,807 |
732 |
44 |
2 |
0 |
13 |
11 |
6 |
15 |
11,630 |
12,858 |
1.11 |
TABLE 8
Summary of Results from Summer 2010 Freeway Vehicle Occupancy Counts
Location |
Direction of Traffic |
Date of Data Collection |
Time of Data Collection |
Number of Lanes |
Total |
Total |
Average Weighted Vehicle Occupancy |
Percent of Vehicles with 1 Person |
Percent of Vehicles with 2 Persons |
Route 3 |
Northbound |
Tuesday, June 15, 2010 |
7:00–9:00 AM |
3 (including breakdown) |
5,965 |
7,279 |
1.22 |
88% |
10% |
Route 24 |
Northbound |
Wednesday, July 7, 2010 |
7:00–9:00 AM |
3 |
9,112 |
11,284 |
1.24 |
84% |
12% |
Route 24 |
Southbound |
Tuesday, June 29, 2010 |
4:00–6:00 PM |
3 |
11,078 |
14,384 |
1.30 |
80% |
17% |
I-90/Mass. Turnpike |
Eastbound |
Wednesday, June 23, 2010 |
7:00–9:00 AM |
3 |
9,208 |
10,912 |
1.19 |
88% |
11% |
I-95 |
Northbound |
Tuesday, June 22, 2010 |
4:00–6:00 PM |
4 |
10,376 |
11,794 |
1.14 |
91% |
8% |
I-93 |
Northbound |
Wednesday, July 7, 2010 |
4:00–6:00 PM |
4 |
12,843 |
15,936 |
1.24 |
83% |
12% |
I-93 |
Southbound |
Tuesday, June 29, 2010 |
7:00–9:00 AM |
4 |
11,630 |
12,858 |
1.11 |
93% |
6% |
Appendix 1
I-93 Southeast Expressway Northbound General-Purpose and HOV Lane Vehicle Occupancy Counts
November 16, 2010
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5+ |
Microbus |
Bus |
Police/ |
Not |
Total |
Total |
Vehicle Occupancy |
|
Time |
6:00–7:00 AM |
|
|
|
||||||||
HOV |
4 |
1,027 |
128 |
10 |
7 |
14 |
21 |
9 |
6 |
1,226 |
3,216 |
2.62 |
General |
5,222 |
228 |
15 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
13 |
4 |
16 |
5,506 |
6,162 |
1.12 |
All |
5,226 |
1,255 |
143 |
11 |
7 |
21 |
34 |
13 |
22 |
6,732 |
9,378 |
1.39 |
Time |
7:00–8:00 AM |
|
|
|
||||||||
HOV |
15 |
1,044 |
75 |
9 |
3 |
23 |
18 |
8 |
1 |
1,196 |
3,079 |
2.57 |
General |
4,198 |
224 |
11 |
1 |
0 |
6 |
6 |
4 |
30 |
4,480 |
4,961 |
1.11 |
All |
4,213 |
1,268 |
86 |
10 |
3 |
29 |
24 |
12 |
31 |
5,676 |
8,040 |
1.42 |
Time |
8:00–9:00 AM |
|
|
|
||||||||
HOV |
5 |
864 |
88 |
14 |
3 |
9 |
19 |
8 |
0 |
1,010 |
2,651 |
2.62 |
General |
4,182 |
214 |
9 |
5 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
6 |
24 |
4,446 |
4,807 |
1.08 |
All |
4,187 |
1,078 |
97 |
19 |
3 |
13 |
21 |
14 |
24 |
5,456 |
7,458 |
1.37 |
Time |
9:00–10:00 AM |
|
|
|
||||||||
HOV |
8 |
765 |
25 |
5 |
2 |
10 |
19 |
2 |
0 |
836 |
2,223 |
2.66 |
General |
4,962 |
334 |
15 |
2 |
0 |
11 |
9 |
6 |
3 |
5,342 |
6,036 |
1.13 |
All |
4,970 |
1,099 |
40 |
7 |
2 |
21 |
28 |
8 |
3 |
6,178 |
8,259 |
1.34 |
Time |
6:00–10:00 AM |
|||||||||||
HOV |
32 |
3,700 |
316 |
38 |
15 |
56 |
77 |
27 |
7 |
4,268 |
11,168 |
2.62 |
General |
18,564 |
1,000 |
50 |
9 |
0 |
28 |
30 |
20 |
73 |
19,774 |
21,966 |
1.11 |
All |
18,596 |
4,700 |
366 |
47 |
15 |
84 |
107 |
47 |
80 |
24,042 |
33,134 |
1.38 |
Appendix 2
I-93 Southbound General-Purpose and HOV Lane Vehicle Occupancy Counts
November 17, 2010
Lane Type |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5+ |
Microbus |
Bus |
Police/ |
Not |
Total |
Total |
Vehicle Occupancy |
Time |
6:00–7:00 AM |
|
|
|
||||||||
HOV |
126 |
588 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
12 |
1 |
0 |
744 |
1,732 |
2.33 |
General |
2,814 |
67 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
15 |
4 |
50 |
2,957 |
3,480 |
1.18 |
All |
2,940 |
655 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
27 |
5 |
50 |
3,701 |
5,212 |
1.41 |
Time |
7:00–8:00 AM |
|
|
|
||||||||
HOV |
105 |
615 |
22 |
2 |
0 |
5 |
23 |
4 |
0 |
776 |
2,042 |
2.63 |
General |
2,711 |
56 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
16 |
2,797 |
2,993 |
1.07 |
All |
2,816 |
671 |
23 |
2 |
0 |
10 |
26 |
9 |
16 |
3,573 |
5,035 |
1.41 |
Time |
8:00–9:00 AM |
|
|
|
||||||||
HOV |
168 |
586 |
12 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
23 |
3 |
0 |
798 |
2,005 |
2.51 |
General |
2,339 |
143 |
19 |
2 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
2 |
15 |
2,526 |
2,784 |
1.10 |
All |
2,507 |
729 |
31 |
4 |
0 |
10 |
23 |
5 |
15 |
3,324 |
4,789 |
1.44 |
Time |
9:00–10:00 AM |
|
|
|
||||||||
HOV |
119 |
583 |
32 |
10 |
0 |
9 |
34 |
1 |
0 |
788 |
2,363 |
3.00 |
General |
2,650 |
176 |
7 |
2 |
0 |
20 |
2 |
3 |
13 |
2,873 |
3,313 |
1.15 |
All |
2,769 |
759 |
39 |
12 |
0 |
29 |
36 |
4 |
13 |
3,661 |
5,676 |
1.55 |
Time |
6:00–10:00 AM |
|
|
|
||||||||
HOV |
518 |
2,372 |
72 |
14 |
0 |
29 |
92 |
9 |
0 |
3,106 |
8,142 |
2.62 |
General |
10,514 |
442 |
30 |
4 |
0 |
35 |
20 |
14 |
94 |
11,153 |
12,570 |
1.13 |
All |
11,032 |
2,814 |
102 |
18 |
0 |
64 |
112 |
23 |
94 |
14,259 |
20,712 |
1.45 |