Executive Summary
Chapter 1: Purpose of the Plan
Chapter 2: Overview of Transportation Needs
Chapter 3: Planning and Investment Framework
Chapter 4: Guiding MPO Investments
Chapter 5: Recommended Plan
Chapter 6: Moving Forward/Next Steps
Certification of the Boston Region MPO Transportation Planning Process
Prepared by The Central Transportation Planning Staff: Staff to the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization
Directed by the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization, which is composed of the
Massachusetts Department of Transportation
Metropolitan Area Planning Council
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
MBTA Advisory Board
Massachusetts Port Authority
Regional Transportation Advisory Council
City of Boston
City of Beverly
City of Everett
City of Framingham
City of Newton
City of Somerville
Town of Acton
Town of Brookline
Town of Burlington
Town of Hull
Town of Norwood
Federal Highway Administration (nonvoting)
Federal Transit Administration (nonvoting)
This document was funded in part through grants from the US Department of Transportation. Its contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the US Department of Transportation.
Meeting locations are accessible to people with disabilities and are near public transportation. Upon request (preferably two weeks in advance of the meeting), every effort will be made to provide accommodations such as assistive listening devices, materials in accessible formats and in languages other than English, and interpreters in American Sign Language and other languages. Please contact the MPO staff at 857.702.3700 (voice), 617.570.9193 (TTY), 617.570.9192 (fax), or eharvey@ctps.org.
The Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) operates its programs, services, and activities in compliance with federal nondiscrimination laws including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI), the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, and related statutes and regulations. Title VI prohibits discrimination in federally assisted programs and requires that no person in the United States of America shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin (including limited English proficiency), be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity that receives federal assistance. Related federal nondiscrimination laws administered by the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, or both, prohibit discrimination on the basis of age, sex, and disability. The Boston Region MPO considers these protected populations in its Title VI Programs, consistent with federal interpretation and administration. In addition, the Boston Region MPO provides meaningful access to its programs, services, and activities to individuals with limited English proficiency, in compliance with U.S. Department of Transportation policy and guidance on federal Executive Order 13166.
The Boston Region MPO also complies with the Massachusetts Public Accommodation Law, M.G.L. c 272 sections 92a, 98, 98a, which prohibits making any distinction, discrimination, or restriction in admission to, or treatment in a place of public accommodation based on race, color, religious creed, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, disability, or ancestry. Likewise, the Boston Region MPO complies with the Governor's Executive Order 526, section 4, which requires that all programs, activities, and services provided, performed, licensed, chartered, funded, regulated, or contracted for by the state shall be conducted without unlawful discrimination based on race, color, age, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, religion, creed, ancestry, national origin, disability, veteran's status (including Vietnam-era veterans), or background.
A complaint form and additional information can be obtained by contacting the MPO or at http://www.bostonmpo.org/mpo_non_discrimination. To request this information in a different language or in an accessible format, please contact
Title VI Specialist Boston Region MPO 10 Park Plaza, Suite 2150 Boston, MA 02116 civilrights@ctps.org
By telephone: 857.702.3700(voice)
For people with hearing or speaking difficulties, connect through the state MassRelay service: Relay Using TTY or Hearing Carry-over: 800.439.2370 Relay Using Voice Carry-over: 866.887.6619 Relay Using Text to Speech: 866.645.9870
For more information, including numbers for Spanish speakers, visit https://www.mass.gov/massrelay
Bradley Putnam, LRTP Manager, Central Transportation Planning Staff 10 Park Plaza, Suite 2150 Boston, MA 02116
857.702.3703 (voice) For people with hearing or speaking difficulties, connect through the state MassRelay service: Relay Using TTY or Hearing Carry-over: 800.439.2370 Relay Using Voice Carry-over: 866.887.6619 Relay Using Text to Speech: 866.645.9870 For more information, including numbers for Spanish speakers, visit https://www.mass.gov/massrelay
[SIGNED CERTIFICATION]
Abbreviation |
Term |
---|---|
3C |
continuous, comprehensive, cooperative [metropolitan transportation planning process] |
AAB |
Massachusetts Architectural Access Board |
AADT |
average annual daily traffic |
ABP |
Accelerated Bridge Program [MassDOT program] |
AC |
advance construction |
ACS |
American Community Survey [US Census Bureau data] |
ADA |
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
AFC |
automated fare collection |
ALI |
Activity Line Item |
ARPA |
American Rescue Plan Act |
BIL |
Bipartisan Infrastructure Law |
BFP |
Bridge Formula Program [federal funding program] |
BR |
Bridge [highway investment program] |
BRT |
bus rapid transit |
CA/T |
Central Artery/Tunnel [project also known as “the Big Dig”] |
CAA |
Clean Air Act |
CAAA |
Clean Air Act Amendments |
CARES Act |
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act |
CATA |
Cape Ann Transportation Authority |
CECP |
Massachusetts Clean Energy and Climate Plan |
CFR |
Code of Federal Regulations |
CIP |
Capital Investment Plan [MassDOT] |
CMAQ |
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality [federal funding program] |
CMR |
Code of Massachusetts Regulations |
CMP |
Congestion Management Process |
CNG |
compressed natural gas |
CO |
carbon monoxide |
CO2 |
carbon dioxide |
CPT–HST |
Coordinated Public Transit–Human Services Transportation Plan |
CRRSAA |
Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act |
CTPS |
Central Transportation Planning Staff |
CY |
calendar year |
DCR |
Department of Conservation and Recreation |
DEP |
Department of Environmental Protection [Massachusetts] |
DOD |
United States Department of Defense |
DOT |
department of transportation |
DVR |
digital video recorder |
EB |
eastbound |
EDTTT |
excessive delay threshold travel time |
EJ |
environmental justice |
EO |
executive order |
EOEEA |
Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs |
EOHED |
Massachusetts Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development |
EPA |
United States Environmental Protection Agency |
EPDO |
equivalent property damage only [a traffic-related index] |
EV |
electric vehicle |
FARS |
Fatality Analysis and Reporting System [FHWA] |
FAST Act |
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act |
FEMA |
Federal Emergency Management Agency |
FFY |
federal fiscal year |
FHWA |
Federal Highway Administration |
FMCB |
MBTA Fiscal and Management Control Board |
FMLA |
Federal Land Management Agency |
FR |
Federal Register |
FTA |
Federal Transit Administration |
GANS |
grant anticipation notes [municipal bond financing] |
GHG |
greenhouse gas |
GWSA |
Global Warming Solutions Act of 2008 [Massachusetts] |
HIP |
Highway Infrastructure Program [federal funding program] |
HOV |
high-occupancy vehicle |
HSIP |
Highway Safety Improvement Program [federal funding program] |
I |
Interstate |
ICC |
Inner Core Committee [MAPC municipal subregion] |
IRI |
International Roughness Index |
ITS |
intelligent transportation systems |
LED |
light-emitting diode |
LEP |
limited English proficiency |
LF |
local funds |
LOTTR |
level of travel time ratio |
LRTP |
Long-Range Transportation Plan [MPO certification document] |
MAGIC |
Minuteman Advisory Group on Interlocal Coordination [MAPC municipal subregion] |
MAP-21 |
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act |
MAPC |
Metropolitan Area Planning Council |
MARPA |
Massachusetts Association of Regional Planning Agencies |
MART |
Montachusett Regional Transit Authority |
MassDOT |
Massachusetts Department of Transportation |
Massport |
Massachusetts Port Authority |
MBTA |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority |
MCRT |
Mass Central Rail Trail |
MOVES |
Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator [EPA air quality model] |
MPO |
metropolitan planning organization |
MOU |
memorandum of understanding |
MWRC |
MetroWest Regional Collaborative [MAPC municipal subregion] |
MWRTA |
MetroWest Regional Transit Authority |
NAAQS |
National Ambient Air Quality Standards |
NB |
northbound |
NBI |
National Bridge Inventory |
NEVI |
National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Program [federal funding program] |
NFA |
Non-federal aid |
NGBP |
Next Generation Bridge Program [MassDOT program] |
NH DOT |
New Hampshire Department of Transportation |
NHFP |
National Highway Freight Program [federal funding program] |
NHPP |
National Highway Performance Program [federal funding program] |
NHS |
National Highway System |
NHTSA |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration |
NMCOG |
Northern Middlesex Council of Governments |
NOx |
nitrogen oxides |
NPMRDS |
National Performance Measure Research Data Set [FHWA] |
NSPC |
North Suburban Planning Council [MAPC municipal subregion] |
NSTF |
North Shore Task Force [MAPC municipal subregion] |
NTD |
National Transit Database |
OF |
other federal funding |
O&M |
operations and management |
PBPP |
performance-based planning and programming |
PEN |
penalty funding |
PHED |
peak hours of excessive delay |
PL |
metropolitan planning funds [FHWA] or public law funds |
PM |
particulate matter |
PNF |
project need form [MassDOT] |
ppm |
parts per million |
PRC |
Project Review Committee [MassDOT] |
PSAC |
Project Selection Advisory Council [MassDOT] |
PSI |
Pavement Serviceability Index |
PTASP |
Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan |
RITIS |
Regional Integrated Transportation Information System |
RRIF |
Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing |
RTA |
regional transit authority |
RTAC |
Regional Transportation Advisory Council [of the Boston Region MPO] |
RTACAP |
Regional transit authority capital funds |
SB |
southbound |
SFY |
state fiscal year |
SHSP |
Strategic Highway Safety Plan |
SIP |
State Implementation Plan |
SMS |
safety management systems |
SOV |
single-occupant vehicle |
SPR |
Statewide Planning and Research |
SRTS |
Safe Routes to School [federal program] |
SSC |
South Shore Coalition [MAPC municipal subregion] |
STRAHNET |
Strategic Highway Network |
STBG |
Surface Transportation Block Grant Program [federal funding program] |
STIP |
State Transportation Improvement Program |
SWAP |
South West Advisory Planning Committee [MAPC municipal subregion] |
TAM |
Transit Asset Management Plan |
TAMP |
Transportation Asset Management Plan |
TAP |
Transportation Alternatives Program [federal funding program] |
TAZ |
transportation analysis zone |
TBD |
to be determined |
TCM |
transportation control measure |
TE |
transportation equity |
TERM |
Transit Economic Requirements Model [FTA] |
TFPC |
Total Federal Participating Cost |
TIFIA |
Transportation Infrastructure and Innovation Act |
TIP |
Transportation Improvement Program [MPO certification document] |
TMA |
transportation management association |
TRIC |
Three Rivers Interlocal Council [MAPC municipal subregion] |
TSP |
transit signal priority |
TTTR |
Truck Travel Time Reliability Index |
ULB |
useful life benchmark |
UPWP |
Unified Planning Work Program [MPO certification document] |
USC |
United States Code |
USDOT |
United States Department of Transportation |
UZA |
urbanized area |
WB |
westbound |
VPI |
virtual public involvement |
VMT |
vehicle-miles traveled |
VOCs |
volatile organic compounds |
VRM |
vehicle revenue-miles |
VUS |
Vulnerable User Safety [federal funding program] |
Destination 2050 is the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization’s (MPO) Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). Updated every four years, it guides decisions about investments in the region’s transportation network to move the system towards the MPO’s vision for its future:
The Boston Region MPO envisions an equitable, pollution-free, and modern regional transportation system that gets people to their destinations safely, easily, and reliably, and that supports an inclusive, resilient, healthy, and economically vibrant Boston region.
To create a plan designed to implement this vision, the LRTP
The MPO conducted engagement activities throughout the development of the LRTP. Engagement began in fall 2019 with the kick-off development of the Needs Assessment and continued through the 30-day public comment period for the draft LRTP in the summer of 2023. The MPO conducted two public surveys: one on vision, goals, and objectives; and one on investment priorities. The MPO engaged many stakeholders, including the Regional Transportation Advisory Council, municipalities, the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT), the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), regional transit authorities, community organizations, economic development and business organizations, transportation equity advocates, environmental advocates, and academic institutions.
A critical step in developing the LRTP was to collect, analyze, and identify transportation needs for the Boston region. Using results from data analyses and engagement activities, the Needs Assessment documents the transportation needs of the Boston region since the last LRTP was approved in 2019, focusing on the years between 2019 and 2023. It looks at how people travel; the condition of transportation facilities; the interaction of the transportation system with the built and natural environment and how well it serves minority, low-income, and other disadvantaged populations; and possible changes to travel patterns and demand in the future. It supports the LRTP by providing information about the region’s most pressing transportation needs, thereby shaping the MPO’s vision, goals, and objectives; and informing the development of new investment programs.
The Needs Assessment summarizes needs within each of the MPO’s goal areas. Equity is integrated throughout the Needs Assessment—transportation impacts on transportation equity populations are assessed within the context of each goal area. Some of the needs identified are to
To explore these and other analyses, see the full Needs Assessment, which is compiled into a series of interactive StoryMaps where readers can explore a series of maps, charts, and tables, and is available on the MPO’s website.
During each LRTP development cycle, the MPO updates its planning framework, which consists of a vision statement, a set of goals, and a series of objectives associated with each goal (Figure ES-1). These serve as a guide for MPO decision-making for the next four years. The content of this framework—particularly the MPO goals—informs staff proposals and MPO decisions related to creating investment programs for the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Further, studies proposed for funding each year in the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) are assessed for their support of the MPO goals, and the objectives are translated into criteria for use in the TIP project selection process to ensure projects funded by the MPO support the MPO’s goals. Finally, this framework, including its vision, helps communicate the MPO’s values to partners, stakeholders, and the public.
Figure ES-1
Destination 2050 Vision, Goals, and Objectives
GOALS | OBJECTIVES |
EQUITY | blank |
Facilitate an inclusive and transparent transportation-planning process and make investments that eliminate transportation-related disparities borne by people in disadvantaged communities. | • Facilitate an inclusive and transparent engagement process with a focus on involving people in disadvantaged communities.* • Ensure that people have meaningful opportunities to share needs and priorities in a way that influences MPO decisions. • Eliminate harmful environmental, health, and safety effects of the transportation system on people in disadvantaged communities. • Invest in high-quality transportation options in disadvantaged communities to fully meet residents’ transportation needs. * Disadvantaged communities are those in which a significant portion of the population identifies as an MPO equity population—people who identify as minority, have limited English proficiency, are 75 years old or older or 17 years old or younger, or have a disability—or has low income. |
SAFETY | blank |
Achieve zero transportation-related fatalities and serious injuries and improve safety for all users of the transportation system. | • Eliminate fatalities, injuries, and safety incidents experienced by people who walk, bike, roll, use assistive mobility devices, travel by car, or take transit. • Prioritize investments that improve safety for the most vulnerable roadway users: people who walk, bike, roll, or use assistive mobility devices. • Prioritize investments that eliminate disparities in safety outcomes for people in disadvantaged communities. |
MOBILITY AND RELIABILITY | blank |
Support easy and reliable movement of people and freight. | • Enable people and goods to travel reliably on the region’s transit and roadway networks. • Prioritize investments that address disparities in transit reliability and frequency for people in disadvantaged communities. • Reduce delay on the region’s roadway network, emphasizing solutions that reduce single-occupancy-vehicle trips, such as travel demand management. • Prioritize investments that reduce delay on the region’s transit network. • Support reliable, safe travel by keeping roadways, bridges, transit assets, and other infrastructure in a state of good repair, and prioritize these investments in disadvantaged communities. • Modernize transit systems and roadway facilities, including by incorporating new technology that supports the MPO’s goals, such as electric-vehicle technologies. |
ACCESS AND CONNECTIVITY | blank |
Provide transportation options and improve access to key destinations to support economic vitality and high quality of life. | • Improve multimodal access to jobs, affordable housing, essential services, education, logistics sites, open space, and other key destinations. • Prioritizing transportation investments that support the region’s and the Commonwealth’s goals for housing production, land use, and economic growth. • Increase people’s access to transit, biking, walking, and other non-single-occupancy-vehicle transportation options to expand their travel choices and opportunities. • Prioritize investments that improve access to high quality, frequent transportation options that enable people in disadvantaged communities to easily get where they want to go. • Close gaps in walking, biking, and transit networks and support interorganizational coordination for seamless travel. • Remove barriers to make it easy for people of all abilities to use the transportation system, regardless of whether they walk, bike, roll, use assistive mobility devices, or take transit. |
RESILIENCY | blank |
Provide transportation that supports sustainable environments and enables people to respond and adapt to climate change and other changing conditions. | • Prioritize investments to make the region’s roadway and transit infrastructure more resilient and responsive to current and future climate hazards, particularly within areas vulnerable to increased heat and precipitation, extreme storms, winter weather, and sea level rise. • Prioritize resiliency investments in disadvantaged communities and in areas that bear disproportionate climate and environmental burdens. • Prioritize investments in transportation resiliency that improve emergency access and protect evacuation routes. • Prioritize investments that include nature-based strategies such as low-impact design, pavement reduction, and landscape buffers to reduce runoff and negative impacts to water resources, open space, and environmentally sensitive areas. |
CLEAN AIR AND HEALTHY COMMUNITIES | blank |
Provide transportation free of greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants and that supports good health. | • Reduce transportation-related greenhouse gases, other air pollutants, and growth in vehicle-miles traveled by encouraging people and goods to move by non-single-occupancy-vehicle modes. • Support transit vehicle electrification and use of electric vehicles throughout the transportation system to reduce greenhouse gases and other air pollutants. • Prioritize investments that address air pollution and environmental burdens experienced by disadvantaged and vulnerable communities. • Support public health through investments in transit and active transportation options and by improving access to outdoor space and healthcare. |
Source: Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization.
The MPO has approximately $5 billion, called discretionary, or Regional Target, dollars, to spend between federal fiscal years 2024 and 2050. The LRTP only lists specific projects between 2024 and 2033, and funding from 2034 to 2050 is allocated to investment programs. The dollars allocated in the LRTP to major infrastructure projects and investment programs must remain within the limit of available funding. Destination 2050 and the short-term capital plan, the TIP, must demonstrate that projects selected by the MPO can be implemented within fiscal constraints. The financial plan for Destination 2050 reflects how the MPO plans to balance the region’s transportation needs while operating under the fiscal constraint of projected revenues.
Regional Target dollars are only a portion of the dollars available to support the region’s transportation system. MassDOT has other sources of funding that it spends on highway projects in the Boston region, as do the MBTA, the Cape Ann Transportation Authority, and the MetroWest Regional Transit Authority to provide and improve transit service.
The Recommended Plan includes the MPO’s investment programs, as well as the major infrastructure projects that federal guidance requires to be listed in the LRTP. Investment programs prioritize the types of transportation projects that the MPO funds through the TIP. Destination 2050’s investment programs include the following:
Table ES-1 shows the percentage of funding dedicated to each investment program in each time band and the total funding allocated to each investment program over the entire plan. The allocations in 2029–33 differ from those in the other time bands because of the combined cost of the Major Infrastructure projects that the MPO selected for that time band.
Table ES-1
Funding Allocated to MPO Investment Programs in Destination 2050
Investment Program |
Percentage Allocation, 2024–28 and 2034–50 |
Percentage Allocation, 2029–33 |
Funding Allocation, 2024–2050 |
Complete Streets |
45% |
30% |
$2,130,828,621 |
Major Infrastructure |
30% |
47% |
$1,643,425,636 |
Intersection Improvements |
12% |
10% |
$584,554,172 |
Bicycle Network and Pedestrian Connections |
5% |
5% |
$250,506,232 |
Transit Transformation |
5% |
5% |
$250,506,232 |
Community Connections |
2% |
2% |
$100,202,493 |
Bikeshare Support |
1% |
1% |
$50,101,246 |
Total |
|
|
$5,010,124,631 |
Note: Years are federal fiscal years
Source: Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization.
The Recommended Plan also includes major infrastructure projects that will be built in the region by 2050. Major infrastructure projects are either
Major infrastructure projects listed in LRTP are shown in Table ES-2. The first project in Table ES-2, Allston Multimodal, is included in the plan for illustrative purposes only and is not within the fiscal constraint of the plan. The second project, I-495 and I-90 Interchange, is funded mostly using MassDOT statewide program priority funding and is also not within the fiscal constraint of the plan.
Table ES-2
Recommended Plan Projects
Project Name |
Current Estimated Cost |
Time Bands |
Within Fiscal Constraint? |
Boston: Allston Multimodal |
$675,500,000 |
2024-28 |
No |
Hopkinton: I-495 and I-90 Interchange |
$300,942,836 |
2024-28 |
No |
Boston: Reconstruction of Rutherford Avenue from City Square to Sullivan Square |
$197,759,449 |
2024-33 |
Yes |
Framingham: Intersection Improvements at Route 126 and Route 135/MBTA and CSX Railroad |
$115,000,000 |
2029-33 |
Yes |
Lexington: Route 4/225 (Bedford Street) and Hartwell Avenue |
$45,000,000 |
2029-33 |
Yes |
Norwood: Intersection Improvements at Route 1 and University Avenue/Everett Street |
$28,699,272 |
2024-28 |
Yes |
Somerville: McGrath Boulevard |
$98,840,000 |
2024-33 |
Yes |
Wrentham: I-495/Route 1A Ramps |
$20,117,638 |
2024-28 |
Yes |
Note: Years are federal fiscal years.
Source: Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization.
ADD TEXT HERE WHEN COMPLETE
Destination 2050 continues the MPO’s practice of providing funding to support bicycle, pedestrian, and transit projects, along with major roadway improvements that promote safety, equity, and multimodal connectivity in the region. Continuing along this course will help to achieve its transportation vision for the future, improve the quality of life for Boston region residents, and enhance the environment in the whole region.
Destination 2050, the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization’s (MPO) Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), will guide the MPO’s decisions about investments in the Boston region’s transportation network to bring the system from its present state towards the MPO’s vision for the future:
According to federal regulations, every MPO must develop an LRTP every four years. The Boston Region MPO developed Destination 2050 by following federal guidance for metropolitan planning, which involved conducting a planning process that engaged the public. Throughout the process, the MPO and public grappled with this challenge:
How can we improve the transportation network to meet existing needs, adapt and modernize it for future demand, and meet climate and other goals while working within the reality of constrained fiscal resources?
The resulting LRTP defines goals and objectives that the MPO will adhere to when making near-term decisions about project and program funding during the next four years. It also outlines the transportation needs and challenges the region faces over the next 25 years. Finally, it identifies strategies to address those needs using the financial resources available to the MPO.
Decisions about allocating transportation funds in a metropolitan area are guided by information and ideas gathered from a broad group of people, including elected officials, municipal planners and engineers, transportation advocates, and interested residents. Metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) are responsible for providing a forum for this decision-making process and for deciding how to spend federal transportation funds for capital projects and planning studies for the area.
Federal legislation requires every metropolitan area in the United States with a population of 50,000 or more (also known as an urbanized area) to establish an MPO. MPOs must carry out a continuing, comprehensive, and cooperative (3C) transportation planning process, resulting in plans and programs consistent with the planning objectives of the metropolitan area, in order to be eligible for federal funds.
More information about the Boston Region MPO, its planning process, and its regulatory framework can be found in Appendices A and B.
The public was consulted throughout the development of the LRTP and its associated Needs Assessment. The Needs Assessment, the vision, goals, and objectives, and the investment programs and projects in the LRTP reflect public engagement during each stage of development. From 2019 to 2023 the MPO received more than 2,000 comments, ideas, and survey responses about the region’s transportation needs, investment priorities, and opportunities for improving the transportation system. This input was gathered through various activities, including the following:
The public comment period for Destination 2050 in June and July of 2023 provided the public a final opportunity to review and comment on the recommended plan and its development process before it wasfinalized. More details about the public input process can be found in Appendix C.
A critical step in developing the Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) was to collect, analyze, and identify transportation needs for the Boston region. Using results from data analyses and public engagement activities, the Needs Assessment documents the transportation needs of the Boston region since the last LRTP was approved in 2019—focusing on the years between 2019 and 2023. Development of the Needs Assessment took into account how people travel, the condition of transportation facilities, the interaction of the transportation system with the built and natural environment, how well it serves and how it impacts minority, low-income, and other disadvantaged populations, and possible changes to travel patterns and demand in the future.
The Needs Assessment supports the LRTP by providing information about the most pressing transportation needs in the Boston region, thereby shaping the MPO’s vision, goals and objectives, and informing the MPO’s decisions about investment programs to develop and projects to prioritize in the LRTP. It also guides future decision-making about projects to fund in the MPO’s Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), studies to conduct through the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP), and work to undertake in the MPO’s programs, such as the Transportation Equity Program and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Support Program.
This chapter summarizes the region’s transportation needs, which are presented in nine interactive StoryMaps online where readers can explore a series of maps, charts, and tables. The StoryMaps are organized by theme, centered around the needs relevant to each Destination 2050 goal area:
The remainder of this chapter provides highlights from the various goal areas of the Needs Assessment.
The MPO’s approach to transportation equity (TE) is rooted in the disparate ways in which the Boston region’s transportation system has and continues to impact different communities. Past transportation decision-making has led to systemic inequities and discriminatory transportation outcomes among TE and other disadvantaged populations, who are often those who can least bear the burdens. The MPO considers six demographic groups TE populations—populations that are protected by federal mandates and that have been disproportionately underserved and overburdened by the Boston region’s transportation system:
The Needs Assessment assesses the equity of the transportation system and the impacts on its residents within the context other goal areas, in two ways:
Transportation needs for TE populations are identified in the context of each analysis, as applicable. In the sections that follow in this chapter, needs for transportation equity populations are identified within each goal area.
While the Boston region has safer roads than the nation at large, the region has been following nationwide trends of more severe crashes and fatalities, especially for bicyclists and pedestrians. During the COVID-19 pandemic, fatalities and serious injuries from crashes decreased, as residents drove fewer miles. But in 2021 and the beginning of 2022, as pandemic-era restrictions loosened and driving approached previous levels, fatalities and serious injuries surpassed pre-pandemic totals.
The Needs Assessment analyses conducted for the MPO’s safety goal area evaluate fatalities and serious injuries for different modes, factors that contribute to crash risk, and transit safety. Table 2-1 summarizes key findings about safety needs that MPO staff identified through data analysis and public input.
Table 2-1
Safety Needs in the Boston Region
Emphasis Area |
Trends |
Need |
Roadway Risk—Fatalities and Serious Injuries |
After an initial decrease in 2020, the rate of fatalities and serious injuries in crashes has increased since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Fatalities and serious injuries are increasing, especially for bicyclists and pedestrians. |
Invest in safety interventions to bring down fatalities and serious injuries toward zero, with a focus on vulnerable roadway users:
|
Roadway Risk—Crash Factors and Locations |
Crash clusters are over-represented in communities with high shares of minority, low-income, or people with LEP, especially pedestrian crash clusters. Crashes involving non-motorized individuals are more likely to result in fatalities and serious injuries. Bicyclists and pedestrians are over-represented as people at risk for crashes. |
Invest in safety interventions in communities that are disproportionately impacted by crashes. Invest in preventative countermeasures on roadways that have been identified as high-risk before severe crashes happen, addressing the relevant high-risk crash factors, such as those that affect bicyclists or pedestrians. |
Transit Risk—Safety Events and Causes |
Transit safety outcomes have remained steady, with slight variations in reliability between modes for each of the three RTAs. |
Assess SGR for each transit system. Within transit agencies’ SMS, address the causes of events. |
LEP = Limited English proficiency. RTA = Regional transit agency. SGR = State of good repair. SMS = Safety Management System.
Source: Boston Region MPO.
Mobility and reliability relate to the seamless and dependable movement of people and freight. This goal focuses on the ability of people in the region to easily travel, regardless of travel mode, as well as the preservation of the region’s transportation assets to enable that ease of travel. Keeping infrastructure in a state of good repair—including bridges, pavement, and fixed rail—ensures that people and freight can travel safely and reliably across the region.
The Needs Assessment analyses conducted for the mobility and reliability goal area evaluates transit and roadway infrastructure condition, and the ease and reliability of travel on roadways, bicycle, and transit. Table 2-2 summarizes key findings about mobility and reliability needs that MPO staff identified through data analysis and public input.
Table 2-2
Mobility and Reliability Needs in the Boston Region
Emphasis Area |
Trend |
Need |
Transit Infrastructure Condition |
Recent slow zones on the public transit network increase the unreliability of travel. |
Upgrade and modernize transit facilities, repair rapid transit tracks and associated infrastructure to reduce slow zones and improve transit reliability and mobility. Provide funding for long-term reliability improvements. |
Road Infrastructure Condition |
Road and bridge conditions have declined slightly in recent years. |
Increase investment in the maintenance of roadways and bridges to keep up with the rate of deterioration. Reduce the deterioration of infrastructure by reducing the number of SOVs on roadways and bridges. |
Transit Mobility |
From 2019 to 2022, on-time performance improved across the MBTA, but more for non-minority bus routes than for minority bus routes. Transit ridership has not recovered since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. |
Improve bus mobility and reliability, focusing on routes with high minority ridership. Identify additional possible corridors for bus rapid transit, focusing on routes with high ridership potential and opportunities to improve reliability. Increase mode shift from SOVs to transit to increase transit ridership. Establish reliable sources of funding to replace funding shortfalls caused by declining ridership. |
Mobility on Roadways |
Recent years have seen a steady rise in roadway congestion across the Boston region. |
Prioritize investments in space-efficient travel such as transit, biking, and walking to reduce reliance on SOVs and, therefore, congestion. Improve management of roadway and parking demand to reduce congestion and encourage alternative transportation modes. Promote TOD to encourage mode shift from driving to transit use, reducing congestion. |
Bicycle Mobility |
Bluebikes ridership more than doubled from 1.7 million to 3.7 million trips between 2018 and 2022, and ridership rose particularly outside of peak travel hours. |
Continue expanding Bluebikes to new neighborhoods, particularly in disadvantaged communities. Develop protected, dedicated bicycle infrastructure to connect near Bluebikes stations and support increases in ridership. |
MBTA = Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. SOV = Single-occupancy vehicle. TOD = Transit-oriented development.
Source: Boston Region MPO.
Access and connectivity are vital aspects of an effective transportation system. People should be able to access the destinations they want, and transportation options should be equally accessible for all groups of people. Similarly, the various components of the transportation system (such as transit, driving, and bicycling) must be connected so that users can access the benefits of the full system.
The Needs Assessment analyses conducted for the access and connectivity goal area evaluate the ability of people to access various forms of transportation, and destinations that are important to quality of life, such as jobs and healthcare. The analyses also measures the connectivity of the transportation network and accessibility for people of all abilities. Table 2-3 summarizes key findings about access and connectivity needs that MPO staff identified through data analysis and public input.
Table 2-3
Access and Connectivity Needs in the Boston Region
Emphasis Area |
Trend |
Need |
Destination Access |
Limited access to parks, particularly for minority and low-income residents. Inequitable access to destinations for low-income residents. |
Expand access to parks, prioritizing minority and low-income communities. Prioritize transportation improvements in low-income communities that provide greater access to destinations. |
Rideshare Usage |
Ridesharing was trending upwards before a drastic decrease in 2020 and is starting to increase again. There are fewer trips now, but they are longer on average. |
Provide reliable alternatives to rideshare and identify gaps in the transit network that are filled by rideshare. |
Proximity to Transportation |
Low electric vehicle charging station density. Increasing equity of access to transit for minority and low-income populations. Poor access to high quality bike infrastructure in minority and low-income neighborhoods. Limited access to frequent transit outside of the urban core. |
Expand the electric vehicle charging network. Continue to expand transit service to TE populations. Upgrade low- and medium-quality bicycle infrastructure to create a high-quality network (i.e., protected bicycle facilities). Improve transit service to areas outside of the urban core. |
Connectivity |
Insufficient data on pedestrian facilities to assess the quality and connectivity of the network. Fragmented bicycle network with high-quality bicycle facilities. |
Gather sidewalk data to help inform where investments should go. Close gaps in the bicycle network, particularly high-quality bicycle infrastructure (i.e., protected bicycle lanes). |
Accessibility |
Poor accessibility at Green Line stations, and incomplete accessibility system-wide at the MBTA. |
Upgrade platforms and trains to provide access for people with disabilities. |
TE = transportation equity.
Source: Boston Region MPO.
Climate change impacts the transportation system in a variety of ways. Extreme air and land surface temperatures can cause asphalt deterioration along roadways, buckling of pavement and rail lines, and health impacts to transportation users. Extreme weather events such as hurricanes and tropical storms have resulted in flooding and inundation of transportation assets along the coastline and are amplified by rising sea levels. Heavy rainfall events and Nor’easters can overwhelm stormwater drainage systems with compounding impacts from sea level rise and high tide cycles. Investments in resilience can enable the region’s transportation system to anticipate extreme events, absorb their impacts, recover in a timely and efficient manner, and adapt to better withstand future disturbances caused by a changing climate.
The Needs Assessment analyses conducted for the resiliency goal area evaluate the vulnerability of transportation assets and people to climate impacts, including sea level rise, flooding due to severe storms, and extreme heat. Table 2-4 summarizes key findings about climate resiliency needs that MPO staff identified through data analysis and public input.
Table 2-4
Resiliency Needs in the Boston Region
Emphasis Area |
Trend |
Need |
Climate Impacts—Flooding |
Some transportation facilities and infrastructure are in places vulnerable to flooding as a result of storm surge, high tide events, and heavy precipitation events. Sea level rise and changing storm behavior caused by climate change are expected to increase the amount of vulnerable infrastructure by 2050. |
Retrofit infrastructure to minimize the impacts of natural hazards and climate change. Prioritize nature-based adaptation strategies such as wetland preservation or rain gardens. Prioritize adaptation in disadvantaged communities and along evacuation routes. |
Extreme Heat |
Extreme heat events in the Boston region are expected to increase in frequency and severity, putting both transportation infrastructure and users at risk. Urban areas are particularly vulnerable to the impacts of extreme heat due to high amounts of paved surfaces and a general lack of tree cover. |
Retrofit infrastructure to better withstand the impacts of extreme heat. Prioritize improvements in areas with populations that are particularly sensitive to extreme heat, such as older adults. Prioritize nature-based adaptation strategies such as tree planting and pavement reduction. |
Regional Coordination |
All MPO municipalities are designated MVP communities and have developed plans and assessments related to resilience-building and vulnerability to climate change. |
Increase engagement between the MPO and municipalities on topics related to climate resilience to prioritize projects of regional significance and coordinate improvements. |
MPO = Metropolitan Planning Organization. MVP = Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness Program.
Source: Boston Region MPO.
The transportation sector produces the highest share of greenhouse gases of any sector in Massachusetts. Single-occupancy vehicle use accounts for most transportation sector emissions. In addition to greenhouse gases, transportation is a major source of air pollutants such as fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ground-level ozone that are harmful to human and environmental health. The transportation sector continues to be a source of harmful air pollution resulting from car, truck, bus, and rail emissions. Emissions from fossil fuel-powered vehicles can impact public health, particularly among populations who live near polluting roadways or congested areas, as well as those more susceptible to adverse health impacts. Exposure to PM2.5, ozone, and other tailpipe pollutants can cause respiratory illnesses, asthma, and cardio-pulmonary disease.
The Needs Assessment analyses conducted for the mobility and reliability goal area evaluate emissions from transportation and their impacts on human and environmental health, including greenhouse gases, carbon monoxide, PM2.5, and ozone. Table 2-5 summarizes key findings about clean air and healthy communities needs that staff identified through data analysis and public input.
Table 2-5
Clean Air and Healthy Communities Needs in the Boston Region
Emphasis Area |
Trend |
Need |
Emissions form SOVs |
Light-duty SOV trips account for most transportation sector emissions. |
Reduce SOV travel in the Boston Region, such as by mode shift, travel demand management, and roadway pricing. Continue to investigate the drivers of SOV travel, as well as its impacts on communities. Expand access to EV charging stations and incentivize EV purchases. |
Emissions from freight activities |
Emissions from heavy-duty truck traffic and idling contributes to global warming and can harm human and environmental health. |
Include freight activities in the conversation surrounding electrification and alternative fuels adoption. Evaluate other strategies to reduce freight and diesel emissions such as vehicle efficiency and facility improvements, diversifying transport modes, sustainable last-mile delivery options, and intelligent transportation systems. |
Emissions from rideshare trips |
The use of rideshare services such as Uber and Lyft is increasing, with implications for increased emissions and traffic congestion. |
Encourage rideshare companies to incentivize use of EVs and shared trips. Investigate transportation needs and motivations behind using rideshare services and improve access to transit and active modes of transportation to reduce use. |
Health impacts |
Exposure to transportation-based air pollutants can harm human health by increasing risk of developing respiratory illness and cardio-pulmonary disease as well as aggravating asthma symptoms. |
Support investments that reduce emissions from SOV travel and other transportation activities through mode shift and electrification. Prioritize air quality improvements in equity communities and in areas that bear a disproportionate burden of transportation impacts. |
Environmental Impacts |
Transportation pollutants can be harmful to the natural environment, slowing plant growth, contributing to lake and stream acidification, affecting nutrient balances in ecosystems, and causing acid rain in urban areas. |
Prioritize projects that consider and limit environmental impacts through nature-based adaptation, low-impact design, and emissions reduction. Minimize the impacts of transportation to sensitive natural environments, such as wetlands, forests, and conservation land. |
Impacts to equity populations |
TE populations are more likely to be exposed to air pollution, traffic congestion, and freight and industrial emissions due to historically inequitable planning practices. Some TE populations are often less able to adapt to poor air quality conditions due to fewer financial resources, lack of access to healthcare and open space, and inability to relocate. |
Prioritize projects that reduce the impacts of emissions and air pollution to TE populations and in overburdened areas. Continue to investigate connections between transportation emissions, air quality, health, and equity in the Boston Region. |
EV = electric vehicles. SOV = single occupancy vehicle. TE = Transportation equity.
Source: Boston Region MPO.
As the Needs Assessment has shown, the Boston region has extensive transportation needs. The Needs Assessment guided the development of Destination 2050’s investment programs and will continue to support the prioritization of the kinds of transportation projects and studies the MPO will fund over the coming years. It will also help staff develop the work undertaken through the MPO’s ongoing programs. By examining recent and existing conditions, the MPO can better understand the region's needs and prioritize future investment to improve the transportation system for everyone.
2-1 TE Populations are defined as follows:
During each Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) development cycle, the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) updates its planning framework, which is made up of a vision statement, a set of goals, and a series of objectives associated with each goal. This planning framework serves as a foundational guide for the MPO’s decision-making. The content of this framework informs staff proposals and MPO decisions related to creating investment programs for the LRTP and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the development of criteria used to evaluate and select TIP projects for funding. This framework also helps to communicate the MPO’s values to partners, stakeholders, and the general public.
The MPO’s previous planning framework was adopted in 2019 as part of the Destination 2040 development process. While developing Destination 2050, the MPO explored ways to refresh this planning framework. Activities to support this update included the following:
The resulting vision statement in this framework offers a succinct picture of the MPO’s hopes for the Boston region’s transportation system and the way it will support quality of life in the region overall. The goal areas and statements provide more detail about what the MPO aspires to achieve for different aspects of the region’s transportation system. The objectives reflect specific actions the MPO can take through its investments, research, and policies to improve the transportation system. Some objectives reflect outcomes, while others reflect where the MPO will focus attention or resources. These objectives are meant to be monitored using quantitative and qualitative information, although neither the goals nor the objectives are time-bound or include specific targets. These elements can be addressed as part of the MPO’s ongoing performance-based planning and programming activities.
The MPO also reviewed responses to its public LRTP Vision and Priorities Survey, which was open from November 21, 2022, until January 20, 2023. This survey included questions asking respondents to rank their transportation priorities, identify words and phrases that describe their ideal transportation system, and describe aspects of the Boston region’s transportation system that need to be improved. Overall, 982 people answered some or all of the survey questions. Staff incorporated details from these responses into both the initial and revised Destination 2050 planning frameworks and continued to refer to these results when working on other aspects of the Destination 2050 process, such as when proposing updates to the MPO’s investment programs. More information on the survey can be found in Appendix C.
This planning framework will help to guide future updates to Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) project selection processes and the MPO’s performance-based planning and programming process.
The MPO’s vision, goals, and objectives are shown in Figure 3-1.
Figure 3-1
Destination 2050 Vision, Goals, and Objectives
GOALS | OBJECTIVES |
EQUITY | blank |
Facilitate an inclusive and transparent transportation-planning process and make investments that eliminate transportation-related disparities borne by people in disadvantaged communities. | • Facilitate an inclusive and transparent engagement process with a focus on involving people in disadvantaged communities.* • Ensure that people have meaningful opportunities to share needs and priorities in a way that influences MPO decisions. • Eliminate harmful environmental, health, and safety effects of the transportation system on people in disadvantaged communities. • Invest in high-quality transportation options in disadvantaged communities to fully meet residents’ transportation needs. * Disadvantaged communities are those in which a significant portion of the population identifies as an MPO equity population—people who identify as minority, have limited English proficiency, are 75 years old or older or 17 years old or younger, or have a disability—or has low income. |
SAFETY | blank |
Achieve zero transportation-related fatalities and serious injuries and improve safety for all users of the transportation system. | • Eliminate fatalities, injuries, and safety incidents experienced by people who walk, bike, roll, use assistive mobility devices, travel by car, or take transit. • Prioritize investments that improve safety for the most vulnerable roadway users: people who walk, bike, roll, or use assistive mobility devices. • Prioritize investments that eliminate disparities in safety outcomes for people in disadvantaged communities. |
MOBILITY AND RELIABILITY | blank |
Support easy and reliable movement of people and freight. | • Enable people and goods to travel reliably on the region’s transit and roadway networks. • Prioritize investments that address disparities in transit reliability and frequency for people in disadvantaged communities. • Reduce delay on the region’s roadway network, emphasizing solutions that reduce single-occupancy-vehicle trips, such as travel demand management. • Prioritize investments that reduce delay on the region’s transit network. • Support reliable, safe travel by keeping roadways, bridges, transit assets, and other infrastructure in a state of good repair, and prioritize these investments in disadvantaged communities. • Modernize transit systems and roadway facilities, including by incorporating new technology that supports the MPO’s goals, such as electric-vehicle technologies. |
ACCESS AND CONNECTIVITY | blank |
Provide transportation options and improve access to key destinations to support economic vitality and high quality of life. | • Improve multimodal access to jobs, affordable housing, essential services, education, logistics sites, open space, and other key destinations. • Prioritizing transportation investments that support the region’s and the Commonwealth’s goals for housing production, land use, and economic growth. • Increase people’s access to transit, biking, walking, and other non-single-occupancy-vehicle transportation options to expand their travel choices and opportunities. • Prioritize investments that improve access to high quality, frequent transportation options that enable people in disadvantaged communities to easily get where they want to go. • Close gaps in walking, biking, and transit networks and support interorganizational coordination for seamless travel. • Remove barriers to make it easy for people of all abilities to use the transportation system, regardless of whether they walk, bike, roll, use assistive mobility devices, or take transit. |
RESILIENCY | blank |
Provide transportation that supports sustainable environments and enables people to respond and adapt to climate change and other changing conditions. | • Prioritize investments to make the region’s roadway and transit infrastructure more resilient and responsive to current and future climate hazards, particularly within areas vulnerable to increased heat and precipitation, extreme storms, winter weather, and sea level rise. • Prioritize resiliency investments in disadvantaged communities and in areas that bear disproportionate climate and environmental burdens. • Prioritize investments in transportation resiliency that improve emergency access and protect evacuation routes. • Prioritize investments that include nature-based strategies such as low-impact design, pavement reduction, and landscape buffers to reduce runoff and negative impacts to water resources, open space, and environmentally sensitive areas. |
CLEAN AIR AND HEALTHY COMMUNITIES | blank |
Provide transportation free of greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants and that supports good health. | • Reduce transportation-related greenhouse gases, other air pollutants, and growth in vehicle-miles traveled by encouraging people and goods to move by non-single-occupancy-vehicle modes. • Support transit vehicle electrification and use of electric vehicles throughout the transportation system to reduce greenhouse gases and other air pollutants. • Prioritize investments that address air pollution and environmental burdens experienced by disadvantaged and vulnerable communities. • Support public health through investments in transit and active transportation options and by improving access to outdoor space and healthcare. |
Source: Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization.
The MPO’s vision, goals, and objectives inform how it invests federal funding in regional transportation improvements. The following section summarizes the federal funding programs that are available to the MPO and its partner agencies.
The Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) receives funding from the federal government for statewide and regional priorities. After accounting for debt service payments, MassDOT allocates funding across the following funding categories:
Finally, once these needs have been satisfied, MassDOT allocates the remaining
funding among the state’s 13 MPOs for programming. This discretionary funding for MPOs is suballocated by formula to determine the Regional Target amounts. The Boston Region MPO receives the largest portion of MPO funding in the state, with approximately 43 percent of Massachusetts’ Regional Target funds allocated to the region. MassDOT develops these targets in consultation with the Massachusetts Association of Regional Planning Agencies (MARPA).
Each MPO may decide how to prioritize its Regional Target funding. Given that
the Regional Target funding is a subset of the Highway Program, the MPO
typically programs the majority of funding for roadway projects; however, the MPO has flexed portions of its highway funding to the Transit Program for transit
expansion projects and through its Transit Modernization and Community
Connections Programs.
The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) allocates the funds programmed in the
TIP Transit Program according to formula. The three transit authorities in
the Boston Region MPO area that are recipients of these funds are the MBTA,
Cape Ann Transportation Authority (CATA), and MetroWest Regional Transit Authority (MWRTA). The MBTA, with its extensive transit program and
infrastructure, is the recipient of the preponderance of the region’s federal transit
funds.
The current federal transportation legislation, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law allocates funding to transit projects through the following formula programs:
More information about these programs can be found in Appendix F.
The Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and its partner transportation agencies anticipate the resources that will be available for transportation capital investment, maintenance, and operations when preparing the Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). For Destination 2050, the MPO has approximately $5 billion in discretionary dollars, known as Regional Target funds, to spend between federal fiscal years (FFYs) 2024 and 2050. The LRTP only lists projects between FFYs 2024 and 2033. For FFYs 2034 to 2050, the MPO allocates percentages of its available funding to investment programs in order to help guide the investments it will make in projects through its five-year capital plan, the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
The dollars allocated in the LRTP to projects and investment programs must remain within the limit of available funding. As such, Destination 2050 and the TIP must demonstrate that projects selected by the MPO can be implemented within fiscal constraints. The financial plan for Destination 2050 reflects how the MPO plans to balance the region’s transportation needs while operating under the fiscal constraint of projected revenues. Table 4-1 shows the Regional Target funding the MPO anticipates having available between FFYs 2024 and 2050.
Table 4-1
Anticipated MPO Regional Target Funding
Time Band |
Anticipated Funding |
FFYs 2024–28 |
$697,545,145 |
FFYs 2029–33 |
$833,039,179 |
FFYs 2034–38 |
$898,589,991 |
FFYs 2039–43 |
$988,357,623 |
FFYs 2044–50 |
$1,592,592,693 |
Total |
$5,010,124,631 |
Source: Massachusetts Department of Transportation
Regional Target dollars are only a portion of the funding available to support the region’s transportation system. The Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) has other sources of funding that it spends on highway projects in the Boston region, as does the MBTA, the Cape Ann Transportation Authority, and the MetroWest Regional Transit Authority to provide and improve transit service.
More information about sources and uses of transportation funding in Massachusetts can be found in Appendix F.
The MPO engaged in a series of interrelated activities to develop Destination 2050, which are illustrated in Figure 4-1 and described below:
Figure 4-1
Destination 2050 Activities
Source: Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization
A major component in the development of the Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) is the Recommended Plan. The Recommended Plan contains the regionally significant projects that are expected to be built in the region in the next 25 years and the investment programs that will guide Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) investments in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). This chapter describes these projects and programs: the investment programs cover those that will be funded with MPO discretionary funds, also called Regional Target funds, while the projects include both those that could be funded with Regional Target funds as well as those prioritized for Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) funding.
This chapter begins with descriptions of the MPO’s investment programs and the expected funding amounts for each program by time band. It then describes the projects that were selected for inclusion in the plan. Finally, it summarizes the results of air quality conformity analyses and greenhouse gas analyses, anticipated performance impacts, and equity impacts for the Recommended Plan.
The Boston Region MPO is responsible for deciding how Regional Target funds are spent in the region. Generally, these investments come in the form of specific transportation projects, such as the reconstruction of a roadway, the conversion of a former railbed into a shared-use path, or providing shuttle service. The MPO uses investment programs to prioritize the types of transportation projects that it funds through the TIP.
The MPO’s investment programs direct funding to priority areas over the 25-year LRTP planning timeframe. The projects that are funded through each program may vary by type (such as intersection improvements versus shared-use path construction), scale, transportation mode (such as the roadway network or transit network), funding source, or other factors. These programs are developed to help the MPO achieve the vision and goals outlined in its LRTP. They also communicate to potential project proponents—such as municipalities or regional transit authorities (RTA)—the types of projects that the MPO is interested in funding.
MPO staff undertook several activities to review and update the investment programs. Staff reviewed laws, plans, policies, and regional transportation needs; consulted MPO members; collected stakeholder input; and consulted project proponents and implementing agencies. Staff then presented their recommendations to the board, which voted to adopt the following investment programs:
In addition, in FFY 2025, the MPO will launch a project design support pilot. The objectives of this pilot program are to provide additional resources for projects to achieve a 25 percent design threshold so that they may be eligible for construction funding through the TIP, to lay a foundation for expanded funding opportunities in later TIP cycles if successful, and to encourage and incentivize the development of transformative projects for the Boston region's transportation network. The pilot will provide financial support to municipalities for the development of capital transportation projects consistent with the MPO’s vision, goals, and objectives. MPO staff will solicit applications from municipalities and engage in a competitive selection process to identify projects approved by MassDOT’s Project Review Committee that require additional resources to reach a state ready for construction. Projects included in the pilot will be funded under the relevant investment programs.
The MPO established its Complete Streets investment program as part of the Charting Progress to 2040 LRTP adopted in 2015 and continued it as part of the Destination 2040 LRTP adopted in 2019. This program modernizes roadway corridors to achieve a variety of MPO goals, such as improving safety, infrastructure condition, and multimodal mobility and access. The projects are initiated through the MassDOT Highway Division Project Development Process and designs are reviewed by MassDOT staff. Complete Streets project elements can include the following:
This investment program is in effect from federal fiscal years (FFY) 2024 through 2050.
The MPO first established its Major Infrastructure program in 2015 as part of Charting Progress to 2040. The program invests in roadway projects that improve expressways and major arterials to reduce congestion and improve safety or transit projects that expand the fixed-guideway network. Since 2015, the MPO has chosen to prioritize lower-cost, smaller-scale projects, limiting large, regionally significant projects to the Major Infrastructure Program. These projects must be listed in the Recommended Plan. The Major Infrastructure investment program is in effect from FFY 2024 through 2050.
Roadway-oriented projects funded by the Major Infrastructure program are initiated through the MassDOT Highway Division Project Development Process and designs are reviewed by MassDOT personnel. Transit projects, such as the Green Line Extension that opened in 2022, are initiated by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA). The criteria for including projects in the Major Infrastructure program have evolved over time in response to changes in federal guidance and MPO board deliberations. The current criteria were adopted by the MPO in October 2020 and are listed below.
Based on federal requirements for LRTPs, the MPO has defined Major Infrastructure projects on the roadway network as those that meet at least one of the following criteria:
Based on federal requirements for LRTPs, the MPO has defined Major Infrastructure projects on the transit network include those that meet at least one of the following criteria:
The MPO established its Intersection Improvements program as part of Charting Progress to 2040 and continued it as part of Destination 2040. This program supports projects that enhance intersections in ways that improve safety and mobility for pedestrians, bicyclists, buses, and cars. Projects funded by this program are initiated through the MassDOT Highway Division Project Development Process and designs are reviewed by MassDOT personnel. They are distinct from Complete Streets projects in that they are focused on one intersection, or several intersections spread out in an area (as opposed to those aligned in the corridor), but they often include elements similar to those in Complete Streets projects:
This investment program is in effect from FFY 2024 through 2050.
The MPO’s Bicycle Network and Pedestrian Connections program was established in Charting Progress to 2040 and continued in Destination 2040. Projects funded through this program expand the region’s bicycle and pedestrian network and support safe bicycle and pedestrian access to key destinations. Like roadway projects in other investment programs, these projects are initiated through the MassDOT Highway Division Project Development Process and designs are reviewed by MassDOT personnel. This program supports the creation of new off-road bicycle and multiuse paths. It can also fund upgrades to bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, such as
This investment program is in effect from FFY 2024 through 2050.
In Destination 2050, the MPO is establishing a new Transit Transformation program. This program is a modified version of the Transit Modernization program included in Destination 2040. Transit Transformation expands beyond the state-of-good-repair and transit infrastructure upgrades of the former Transit Modernization program to incorporate multimodal access and other goals. The Transit Transformation program will fund transit-related investments with higher costs than those typically included in the Community Connections program (typically less than $500,000) but that do not meet the criteria for the Major Infrastructure Program ($50 million or more). Examples of potential projects include
The MPO will continue to direct FFYs 2024–28 funding set-asides for the Transit Modernization program in consultation with the MPO board, the MBTA, the Cape Ann Transit Authority, MetroWest Regional Transit Authority, MassDOT, and other stakeholders prior to more detailed program guidelines being available. The Transit Transformation program will take effect in from FFY 2029 through 2050.
The Community Connections program is the MPO’s funding program for first- and last-mile solutions, community transportation, and other small, nontraditional transportation projects. It evolved out of the Community Transportation/Parking/Clean Air and Mobility Program established through Charting Progress to 2040 and appeared as the Community Connections program in Destination 2040. The goals of this program are to
The Community Connections program differs from the other MPO programs in that project proponents apply solely to the MPO, as opposed to initiating the project through the MassDOT Highway Division or the MBTA. The MPO developed the features and guidelines for this program over time, first through an MPO study designed to create a program framework, then through a pilot-funding round through the TIP. The MPO continues to refine the program’s features and guidelines as they learn from experiences funding different types of projects. Under the current framework, municipalities and RTAs in or overlapping the Boston region may apply for Community Connections funding, while other entities, such as transportation management associations and nonprofit organizations, may apply in partnership with a municipality or RTA that has agreed to serve as a project proponent and fiscal manager.
This investment program is in effect from FFY 2024 through 2050.
In Destination 2040, bikeshare projects were funded through the Community Connections program. In Destination 2050, the MPO is establishing a separate Bikeshare Support program to support capital costs associated with expanding the bikeshare system and replacing or upgrading existing stations. Municipalities that currently participate in the Bluebikes bikeshare system include Arlington, Boston, Brookline, Cambridge, Chelsea, Everett, Malden, Medford, Newton, Revere, Salem, Somerville, and Watertown, and other municipalities have requested to join the Bluebikes system. While this program will focus on supporting the Bluebikes system, it could also support other bikeshare initiatives in the region.
MPO communities can continue to apply for funding for bikeshare capital projects through the Community Connections program from FFY 2024 to 2028. The Bikeshare Support investment program will begin in FFY 2029 and be in effect through 2050.
The Recommended Plan allocates funding to investment programs as a percentage of total available funds. These funding allocations reflect the MPO’s priorities for the types of projects it wishes to fund. Funding percentages by investment program for all time bands except FFY 2029 to 2033 are as follows:
Between 2029 and 2033, funding percentages by investment program are as follows:
The FFYs 2029–33 funding allocations differ from other time bands because of the combined cost of the Major Infrastructure projects that the MPO selected for that time band. All projects that the MPO selected for 2029–33 exceed $50 million and are classified as Major Infrastructure. However, the projects include elements of other MPO investment programs. For example, the McGrath Boulevard project in Somerville has Complete Streets elements, and the project at Route 126, Route 135, and the MBTA and CSX railroads in Framingham has Intersection Improvement elements.
As shown in Chapter 4, the MPO anticipates having slightly more than $5 billion available in total discretionary funding between 2024 and 2050. Table 5-1 applies the percentage funding allocations shown above to each five-year time band in the Recommended Plan to show the total funding that the MPO anticipates allocating to each investment program in each time band.
Table 5-1
Investment Program Funding Allocations
Investment Program |
2024–28 |
2029–33 |
2034–38 |
2039–43 |
2044–50 |
Total |
Complete Streets |
$313,895,315 |
$251,140,168 |
$404,365,496 |
$444,760,930 |
$716,666,712 |
$2,130,828,621 |
Major Infrastructure |
$209,263,544 |
$390,300,000 |
$269,576,997 |
$296,507,287 |
$477,777,808 |
$1,643,425,636 |
Intersection Improvements |
$83,705,417 |
$83,303,918 |
$107,830,799 |
$118,602,915 |
$191,111,123 |
$584,554,172 |
Bicycle Network and Pedestrian Connections |
$34,877,257 |
$41,651,959 |
$44,929,500 |
$49,417,881 |
$79,629,635 |
$250,506,232 |
Transit Transformation |
$34,877,257 |
$41,651,959 |
$44,929,500 |
$49,417,881 |
$79,629,635 |
$250,506,232 |
Community Connections |
$13,950,903 |
$16,660,784 |
$17,971,800 |
$19,767,152 |
$31,851,854 |
$100,202,493 |
Bikeshare Support |
$6,975,451 |
$8,330,392 |
$8,985,900 |
$9,883,576 |
$15,925,927 |
$50,101,246 |
Total |
$697,545,145 |
$833,039,179 |
$898,589,991 |
$988,357,623 |
$1,592,592,693 |
$5,010,124,631 |
Notes: Years are federal fiscal years.
Source: Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization.
Federal regulations require that regionally significant projects be listed in the Recommended Plan; the MPO’s Major Infrastructure program contains these projects. Following the process described in Chapter 4, the MPO selected eight Major Infrastructure projects to list in the Recommended Plan. Those projects are listed in Table 5-2 and mapped in Figure 5-1. The first two projects in Table 5-2, Allston Multimodal and I-495/I-90 Interchange, are statewide priority projects that are outside the fiscally constrained portion of the LRTP.
Being listed in the Recommended Plan does not guarantee MPO funding for a project, as projects are listed based on federal requirements for LRTPs. To receive MPO funding, projects must be submitted to the TIP for funding and evaluated through that process.
Table 5-2
Recommended Projects
Proponent |
Project |
ID |
Current Cost |
2024–28 |
2029–33 |
MPO Funding |
Other Funding (Non-MPO Funds) |
MassDOT |
Boston: Allston Multimodal |
606475 |
$675,500,000 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
$675,500,000 |
MassDOT |
Hopkinton: I-495 and I-90 Interchange |
607977 |
$300,942,836 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
$300,942,836 |
MPO |
Boston: Reconstruction of Rutherford Avenue from City Square to Sullivan Square |
606226 |
$197,759,449 |
$42,100,000 |
$154,000,000 |
$196,100,000 |
NA |
MPO |
Framingham: Intersection Improvements at Route 126 and Route 135/MBTA and CSX Railroad |
606109 |
$115,000,000 |
NA |
$145,500,000 |
$145,500,000 |
NA |
MPO |
Lexington: Route 4/225 (Bedford Street) and Hartwell Avenue |
NA |
$45,000,000 |
NA |
$57,000,000 |
$57,000,000 |
NA |
MPO |
Norwood: Intersection Improvements at Route 1 and University Avenue/Everett Street |
605857 |
$28,699,272 |
$28,699,272 |
NA |
$28,699,272 |
NA |
MPO |
Somerville: McGrath Boulevard |
607981 |
$98,840,000 |
$65,000,000 |
$33,800,000 |
$98,800,000 |
NA |
MPO |
Wrentham: I-495/Route 1A Ramps |
603739 |
$20,117,638 |
$20,117,638 |
NA |
$20,117,638 |
NA |
Note: Years are federal fiscal years.
MassDOT = Massachusetts Department of Transportation. MBTA = Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. MPO = Metropolitan Planning Organization.
Source: Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization.
Figure 5-1
Recommended Projects
MPO = Metropolitan Planning Organization.
The following are descriptions of the projects listed in Table 5-2. A description of how the projects were scored can be found in Appendix D.
The Allston Viaduct, which carries the Massachusetts Turnpike (I-90) from the Allston Interchange to the Commonwealth Avenue Bridge, is nearing the end of its useful lifespan, and must be replaced. I-90 is the primary east-west route between Western Massachusetts, Worcester, and Boston, and it carries heavy vacation traffic on weekends. With the change to all electronic tolling, toll booths have been removed from the interchange. This allows for the straightening of the Turnpike in Allston and improvements to multimodal connections.
The interchange is crucial to the Commonwealth's roadway network. Improvement to I-90 as part of this project will ensure its efficient operation. Improvements include
Score: This is a MassDOT-prioritized project and is therefore not directly evaluated using the MPO’s scoring criteria.
For years, the I-495 and I-90 interchange has experienced traffic demands exceeding its capacity. On an average day, more than 100,000 vehicles travel on both I-90 and I-495, with approximately 75,000 vehicles traveling through the interchange, including approximately one-half of all trucks entering eastern Massachusetts. The deficient geometry concentrates movements through the former toll plaza area, resulting in queuing onto the interstate mainlines and crash rates twice the statewide average. The project is meant to improve the movement of people and goods through the area.
Score: This is a MassDOT-prioritized project and is therefore not directly evaluated using the MPO’s scoring criteria.
The Rutherford Avenue project seeks to transform the corridor’s highway-like design into a multimodal urban boulevard. The Rutherford Avenue corridor in the Charlestown neighborhood of Boston extends about 1.5 miles from the North Washington Street Bridge to the Sullivan Square MBTA Orange Line station and then to the Alford Street Bridge at the Mystic River. The existing corridor consists of eight to 10 lanes of median-divided highway that facilitate high-speed automobile travel. Although this roadway layout served high volumes of traffic during construction of the Central Artery/Tunnel project, it now acts as a barrier to the neighborhood. The existing roadway creates significant challenges and safety issues for pedestrians and bicyclists seeking to reach various destinations, including Bunker Hill Community College, Paul Revere Park, the Hood Business Park and Schrafft’s Center employment areas, and MBTA rapid transit stations.
Available project evaluation data were insufficient to score this project.
This project would provide a grade-separated crossing at the intersection of Route 135 and Route 126. Route 135 would be depressed under Route 126 with Route 126 approximately maintaining its existing alignment. The depressed section of Route 135 would extend from approximately 500 feet to the west and east of Route 126. Route 126 would continue to cross the Worcester commuter rail line at grade, but traffic on both Routes 135 and 126 would be significantly less affected by rail operations with this grade separation.
Score: 8 out of 12.
This project proposes to improve safety and capacity management by reconstructing portions of Bedford Street (Routes 4 and 225), Hartwell Avenue, and Wood Street to accommodate people walking, people on bicycles, and people taking transit. It would facilitate traffic flow between I-95 and employment centers along the corridor such as Lincoln Labs and Hanscom Airforce Base. It would improve pedestrian and bicycle needs in the corridor and provide a direct connection to the Minuteman Bikeway. The project would also reconstruct the I-95 ramps.
Score: 10 out of 12.
This project includes traffic signal upgrades and associated geometric improvements at the intersection of Route 1 with University Avenue and Everett Street. Related improvements include constructing an additional travel lane in each direction on Route 1, upgrading traffic signals, lengthening left-turn lanes on Route 1, upgrading pedestrian crossings at each leg of the intersection, and upgrading bicycle amenities (loop detectors) at the intersection. Rehabilitation of sidewalks, curbing, median structures, lighting, and guard rails are also proposed.
Score: 5 out of 12.
This project will remove the existing McCarthy Viaduct along McGrath Boulevard in Somerville and replace it with an at-grade urban boulevard, approximately 1.5 miles long, from Broadway in the north to Third Street in the south. The project will result in more conventional intersection configurations at Washington Street and Somerville Avenue, which are currently under or next to the viaduct. Removing the viaduct will physically reconnect the neighborhoods of Somerville with more direct vehicle, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit networks. The project will enhance transit access along the corridor, improving bus operations and the bus rider experience with the installation of floating/in-lane bus stops, transit signal priority, and bus queue-jump lanes at key intersections. New sidewalks and bicycle facilities will be provided for the length of the proposed McGrath Boulevard and will connect with the extended Somerville Community Path, creating access to the regional bicycle network. The proposed facilities will provide direct intermodal connections to existing bus routes and the new Green Line station in East Somerville.
Score: 8 out of 12.
This project consists of the construction of ramps at the interchange of Route 1A and Interstate 495 to accommodate increased volumes resulting from development at the interchange. The design may proceed by developers and, depending on cost and scale of development proposals, MassDOT may incorporate ramp construction into a highway project. Future mitigation packages for developers may involve a median island to meet MassDOT’s and the Town of Wrentham’s long-range plan for the interchange.
Score: 4 out of 12.
The Determination of Air Quality Conformity in Appendix E documents the latest air quality conformity status and requirements for the Boston Region MPO area in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency’s and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ latest conformity regulations and guidance. This includes conformity determination for the 1997 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and carbon monoxide NAAQS, as well as the Boston Region’s designation status, legal background and considerations, and federal guidance. The analyses demonstrate that Destination 2050 meets the Clean Air Act and Transportation Conformity Rule requirements for the 1997 Ozone NAAQS and is consistent with the air quality goals of, and in conformity with, the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
The Greenhouse Gas Analysis section of Appendix E explains the legislation and regulations that establish the MPO’s responsibilities to contribute to emissions reduction and statewide goals. The MPO’s relationship with MassDOT and strategies for reducing emissions are also explained. It documents modeled greenhouse gas emissions that would be produced from the implementation of projects in this LRTP and other MPOs’ LRTPs in the Commonwealth in order to demonstrate progress toward reducing regional and statewide emissions.
Analysis drives the implementation of Destination 2050. The Boston Region MPO continues to transition to a performance-based approach to making investments in the region’s transportation system. Appendix G describes the MPO’s current set of performance measures and targets and provides information about the current state of the region’s transportation system with respect to relevant measures. In addition, Appendix G explains how the Recommended Plan will help the Boston Region MPO make progress toward its performance goals.
Appendix H contains the federally required Title VI and environmental justice analyses—collectively referred to as a Disparate Impact and Disproportionate Burden (DI/DB) analysis—completed for the MPO-funded projects in the Recommended Plan. The DI/DB analyses determine whether minority and low-income populations may be disproportionately affected by the projects, in the aggregate, in the Recommended Plan. A more detailed description of this analysis can be found in Appendix H. The MPO’s DI/DB policy can be found in Appendix I.
The Destination 2050 Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) provides a 25-year vision for transportation in the Boston region and creates the framework that the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) will use to set its priorities for federally funded transportation planning studies and transportation projects. Upon adoption by the MPO and approval by the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration, Destination 2050 will guide the MPO in its decision-making over the next four years. Each year, the MPO will select studies and transportation projects that support Destination 2050’s goals and objectives and program those studies and projects in the MPO’s Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), respectively.
Destination 2050 is the culmination of a four-year planning process that began with the Needs Assessment in 2019. The Needs Assessment supports the LRTP by providing information about the region’s most pressing transportation needs, thereby shaping the MPO’s vision, goals, and objectives; informing the development of new investment programs; and informing the selection of projects listed in the LRTP. The Needs Assessment will continue to be an important resource for the MPO as it implements Destination 2050 through the UPWP, the TIP, the ongoing performance-based planning and programming (PBPP) process, and other MPO programs.
Figure 6-1 illustrates this feedback relationship between the MPO’s planning, investment decisions, and performance monitoring.
Figure 6-1
MPO Planning Process
LRTP = Long-Range Transportation Plan. MPO = Metropolitan Planning Organization. TIP = Transportation Improvement Program. UPWP = Unified Planning Work Program.
Source: Boston Region MPO.
The implementation of Destination 2050 will include several primary activities:
Other activities will be coordinated with other MPO programs (noted in parentheses in this list):
If, following the adoption of Destination 2050, the MPO decides to make a major policy change, such as new programming, the removal of an existing major infrastructure project, or the addition of a new investment program, an amendment will be required.
To achieve Destination 2050’s vision for the Boston region, the MPO will continue working with its partner agencies and stakeholders on an ongoing basis. The MPO will continue to work with MassDOT, MBTA, and the regional transit authorities to implement a comprehensive set of investments that address the region’s transportation needs in equity, safety, mobility, reliability, access, connectivity, resiliency, and clean air and health. The MPO will also continue to build and maintain relationships with the region’s municipalities, other transit providers, and other stakeholders to find solutions and take advantage of opportunities that support an inclusive, resilient, healthy, and economically vibrant region.
The MPO updates the LRTP every four years, but opportunities to provide information on transportation needs and to participate in the MPO’s planning process are ongoing. There are a variety of ways to stay informed about the MPO transportation planning process:
The following are ways for members of the public to get involved in the MPO transportation planning process: