MPO Meeting Minutes
Draft Memorandum for the Record
Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization
Congestion Management Process Committee Meeting
December 2, 2021, Meeting
9:00 AM–10:00 AM, Zoom Video Conferencing Platform
Jay Monty (City of Everett), Chair
The Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Congestion Management Process Committee (CMP) agreed to the following:
Materials for this meeting included the following:
1. December 17, 2020, meeting minutes
2. 2017–18 Inventory and Utilization of Bicycle Parking Spaces at MBTA Stations Memorandum
See attendance on page 5.
The meeting minutes were approved by the CMP Committee.
The CMP Committee meets one to two times per year. Staff encourages more participation and more feedback from the CMP. Typically, the committee will meet at different times than the Unified Planning Work Program or Administration and Finance committees.
Ryan Hicks presented the 2017–18 MBTA Bicycle Parking Study. In addition to the presentation, he provided a detailed memorandum to attendees that describes the bicycle inventory for every MBTA station. Highlights of the presentation included the following:
· The most common bicycle racks are inverted u-racks, triangle racks, and ribbon racks.
· Detailed station bicycle parking recommendations were presented in four categories: Security, Visibility and Coverage, Aesthetics, and Capacity.
· Commuter rail use is unchanged while rapid transit use decreased seven percent.
· Zero rapid transit stations are 100 percent full in the 2017–18 inventory. Four rapid transit stations were 100 percent full in the 2012–13 inventory.
· The plans are to send this memorandum to the MBTA, conduct outreach, and add datasets from previous inventories to the park and ride dashboard.
Jay Monty asked if the recommendations were general recommendations or specific recommendations for each station.
R. Hicks replied that there are specific recommendations that will be sent to the MBTA.
J. Monty asked about the definition of bicycles parked at other locations.
R. Hicks replied that the data collectors are told to use their judgement to see if bicycles are parked at objects near stations and determine if they are using the MBTA services. Data collectors look to see if the bicycle is parked at items such as trees or street signs. This could be the reason why data at some stations were inconsistent between the 2012–13 and 2017–18 inventories.
Jen Rowe asked whether staff break down the counts based on whether bicycle parking is covered from weather elements.
R. Hicks replied that the MPO indicates if stations that have bicycle racks are covered when the data is collected, but a detailed analysis has not been conducted specifically as to the number of covered bicycle racks at each station. The MPO combines covered and uncovered racks at an entire station. However, some information is available regarding whether individual stations offer covered bicycle parking. The MPO has data that was not presented in the memorandum, which indicates if there is a bicycle cage at the station.
Lenard Diggins asked why we no longer have bicycle theft data.
R. Hicks replied that the data were previously provided by the MBTA Transit Police through a dashboard. Boston MPO staff searched for these data again but could not find them. Staff called the MBTA transit police, and were notified that the data were no longer available in the previous format. The data were collected but they are no longer processed to represent each individual station.
L. Diggins mentioned that a study should be proposed that will look at bicycle racks at the end of bus lines. This study should also look at adding blue bikes at the end of bus lines.
L. Diggins asked whether staff felt that increasing bicycle use could have a meaningful impact on congestion.
R. Hicks replied that it would reduce congestion. He added that he used to take dockless bicycles to the MBTA stations when he had opportunities to drive.
D. Amstutz expressed surprise that no stations have 100 percent use. He indicated that at Alewife, the station is full to the point where bicycles are parked at objects on certain days. He recommended increasing signage to direct bicyclists to bicycle racks. He also suggested comparing bicycle parking and automobile parking at MBTA stations.
R. Hicks responded that if automobile parking is being used for other uses than using the MBTA, they are excluded from the inventory. In addition, there have been stations with only a couple of bicycles parked at the bike racks but then dozens of bicycles parked at other objects. Signage will help with these issues. At Alewife, it is very concerning that on some days the bicycle racks are overfilled. Staff can investigate this more.
There was none.
There were none.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:55 AM
Members |
Representatives
and
Alternates |
At-Large City (City of Everett) |
Jay Monty |
MassDOT Office of Transportation Planning |
Derek Krevat |
Regional Transportation Advisory Council |
Lenard Diggins |
MassDOT |
John Romano |
Other
Attendees |
Affiliation |
Steve Olanoff |
TRIC/Town of Norwood |
Daniel Amstutz |
Arlington |
Jen Rowe |
City of Boston |
Sheila Page |
Town of Lexington |
MPO
Staff/Central Transportation Planning Staff |
Tegin Teich, Executive Director |
Mark Abbott |
Jonathan Church |
Ryan Hicks |
Sandy Johnston |
Anne McGahan |
Rebecca Morgan |
The Boston Region Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO) operates its programs, services, and activities in
compliance with federal nondiscrimination laws including Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI), the Civil Rights Restoration Act of
1987, and related statutes and regulations. Title VI prohibits discrimination
in federally assisted programs and requires that no person in the United
States of America shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin
(including limited English proficiency), be excluded from participation in,
denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any
program or activity that receives federal assistance. Related federal
nondiscrimination laws administered by the Federal Highway Administration,
Federal Transit Administration, or both, prohibit discrimination on the basis
of age, sex, and disability. The Boston Region MPO considers these protected
populations in its Title VI Programs, consistent with federal interpretation
and administration. In addition, the Boston Region MPO provides meaningful
access to its programs, services, and activities to individuals with limited
English proficiency, in compliance with U.S. Department of Transportation
policy and guidance on federal Executive Order 13166. The Boston Region MPO also complies with the
Massachusetts Public Accommodation Law, M.G.L. c 272 sections 92a, 98, 98a,
which prohibits making any distinction, discrimination, or restriction in
admission to, or treatment in a place of public accommodation based on race,
color, religious creed, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, disability,
or ancestry. Likewise, the Boston Region MPO complies with the Governor's
Executive Order 526, section 4, which requires that all programs, activities,
and services provided, performed, licensed, chartered, funded, regulated, or
contracted for by the state shall be conducted without unlawful
discrimination based on race, color, age, gender, ethnicity, sexual
orientation, gender identity or expression, religion, creed, ancestry,
national origin, disability, veteran's status (including Vietnam-era
veterans), or background. A complaint form and additional information
can be obtained by contacting the MPO or at http://www.bostonmpo.org/mpo_non_discrimination. To request this
information in a different language or in an accessible format, please
contact Title VI Specialist By Telephone: For people with hearing or speaking difficulties, connect through the
state MassRelay service: · Relay Using TTY or Hearing Carry-over: 800.439.2370 · Relay Using Voice Carry-over: 866.887.6619 · Relay Using Text to Speech: 866.645.9870 For more information, including numbers for Spanish
speakers, visit https://www.mass.gov/massrelay. |