Memorandum

Date      September 15, 2016

TO           Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization

FROM     Karl H. Quackenbush
CTPS Executive Director

RE           Work Program for: Section 405C Traffic Records Improvement

Action Required

Review and approval

Proposed Motion

That the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization, upon the recommendation of the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security’s (EOPSS) Executive Traffic Records Coordinating Committee, vote to approve the work program for Section 405C Traffic Records Improvement presented in this memorandum

Project Identification

Unified Planning Work Program Classification

Other Transportation Client Planning Studies and Technical Analyses

Project Identification

CTPS Project Number 11158

Clients

EOPSS, Office of Grants and Research, Grant Supervisor: Barbara Rizzuti

MassDOT Office of Transportation Planning, Project Supervisor: Kevin Lopes

MassDOT Traffic and Safety Engineering, Project Supervisor: Bonnie Polin

CTPS Project Supervisors

Principal: Mark Abbott

Manager: Kathy Jacob

Funding

EOPSS, federal fiscal year (FFY) 2016 Traffic Information Systems Improvement Grant (405C)

Impact on MPO Work

The MPO staff has sufficient resources to complete this work in a capable and timely manner. By undertaking this work, the MPO staff will neither delay the completion of nor reduce the quality of any work in the UPWP.

Background

The federal transportation reauthorizing legislation, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21), identified the need for improved and more robust safety data to support development of states’ Strategic Highway Safety Plans (SHSPs) and Highway Safety Improvement Programs (HSIPs).

As a result, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) developed database guidelines for roadway and traffic elements critical to safety management, called Model Inventory of Roadway Elements (MIRE); and the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) developed a companion set of guidelines for crash elements, Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC), to address the database needs for crash analyses. Many of these database elements overlap, but because this project will deal with building a database for Road Inventory and traffic-control data, it will emphasize the MIRE elements.

In 2015, the latest authorizing federal legislation, Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, was signed into law; and as of April 14, 2016, FHWA established rules requiring states to:

Objectives

Work Description

Traffic-control data is not standardized, and the datasets that support signalized and un-signalized intersections come in many forms. For this project, staff will combine two sources described below (one existing database from MassDOT, and one from CTPS) to create a test database with information about locations of approximately 5,400 junctions that are believed to be signalized.  

Task 1 Collect, Evaluate, and Verify FDEs for Signalized Intersections

MassDOT has a physical asset inventory comprised of approximately 1,500 state-owned traffic signals, which contains spatial data identifying the location of each signal. CTPS maintains a GIS database of traffic signals that have been gathered from MassDOT’s signal permit archives of municipally owned signals, CTPS studies, and seven municipalities in the Boston Region MPO—the cities of Boston, Cambridge, Everett, Newton, Somerville and the towns of Brookline and Dedham. Combined, these resources will form the test database of 5,400 signalized locations. For this part of the project, CTPS will collect FDEs at each of these junctions using the template tool developed by VHB; and will examine them using MassGIS Ortho-photography, Pictometry Imagery, Google StreetView, and Bing StreetView.

Product of Task 1

A signalized junction spatial test database populated with approximately 5,400 records containing the required FDEs

Task 2 Collect, Evaluate, and Verify FDEs for Non-signalized Locations

MassDOT Traffic Safety and Engineering staff will identify approximately 100 junctions in the Commonwealth that they believe are not signalized. CTPS will collect the FDEs at each of these junctions using the template tool developed by VHB; and will examine them using MassGIS Ortho-photography, Pictometry Imagery, Google StreetView, and Bing StreetView.

Product of Task 2

A non-signalized junction spatial test database populated with approximately 100 records containing the required FDEs

Task 3 Investigate Methodologies of Automatic Collection of Traffic-Signal Data

CTPS and MassDOT Traffic and Safety Engineering staff will investigate automated and semi-automated methodologies in GIS and explore how other data sources, such as the Crash Data System, which include information about signals, could help improve the data-collection process.

Product of Task 3

Results of investigation into other data sources and automated and semi-automated methods of data collection

Task 4 Collect Data about What Other Traffic-Control Information Exists in the State

CTPS staff will contact 1) municipal officials in the approximately 340 cities and towns in Massachusetts for which CTPS does not have traffic signal data, and 2) officials in other MPOs in the state, and attempt to collect, inventory, and examine whatever traffic-signal data each city, town, or MPO has. Staff will compile the data into a statewide GIS database of municipal traffic signals that will be delivered to the GIS manager in MassDOT’s Office of Transportation Planning. The GIS data will be delivered in the form of a shapefile or GeoDatabase, which can be used to create an “event layer” for incorporation into the statewide Road Inventory.

 This process will involve the following steps:

Products of Task 4

Task 5 Evaluation Report and Documentation for Junction Databases

CTPS will document its experience using the template, identify the methodology it used to populate the FDEs in all of the databases, and identify the level of effort required to accomplish this task, including a discussion of any alternative approaches that may have arisen during research. Finally, CTPS will discuss what other traffic-control data may exist, including their form and condition, in order to provide the client with an estimate of the future level of effort required to complete collection of FDEs for the approximately 200,000 remaining junctions (or intersections) in Massachusetts.

Product of Task 5

Estimated Schedule

It is estimated that this project will be completed 12 months after work commences. The proposed schedule, by task, is shown in Exhibit 1.

Estimated Cost

The total cost of this project is estimated to be $96,724. This includes the cost of  42.1 person-weeks of staff time, and overhead at the rate of 102.7 percent. A detailed breakdown of estimated costs is presented in Exhibit 2.

 

KQ/MA/sap

Exhibit 1
ESTIMATED SCHEDULE
Section 405C Traffic Records Improvement


Task
Month
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1.
Collect, Evaluate, and Verify FDEs for Signalized Intersections
From month 1 to 6.3.
2.
Collect, Evaluate, and Verify FDEs Non-signalized Locations
From month 5.4 to 10.
3.
Investigate Methodologies of Automatic Collection of Traffic Signal Data
From month 1.2 to 5.8.
4.
Collect Data on What Other Traffic Control Information Exists in the State
From month 1.9 to 9.1.
5.
Evaluation Report and Documentation for Junction Databases
From month 8.2 to 12.8.

Exhibit 2
ESTIMATED COST
Section 405C Traffic Records Improvement

Direct Salary and Overhead

$96,724

Task
Person-Weeks Direct
Salary
Overhead
(102.70%)
Total
Cost
M-1 P-5 P-4 Temp Total
1.
Collect, Evaluate, and Verify FDEs for Signalized Intersections
1.2 0.0 17.7 7.0 25.9 $29,696 $30,498 $60,195
2.
Collect, Evaluate, and Verify FDEs Non-signalized Locations
0.1 0.0 0.8 1.0 1.9 $1,789 $1,838 $3,627
3.
Investigate Methodologies of Automatic Collection of Traffic Signal Data
0.4 0.6 0.2 0.0 1.2 $2,109 $2,166 $4,275
4.
Collect Data on What Other Traffic Control Information Exists in the State
0.4 0.0 1.5 4.0 5.9 $4,814 $4,944 $9,759
5.
Evaluation Report and Documentation for Junction Databases
3.0 0.0 2.1 2.0 7.1 $9,308 $9,560 $18,868
Total
5.1 0.6 22.4 14.0 42.1 $47,718 $49,006 $96,724

Other Direct Costs

$0

TOTAL COST

$96,724
Funding
Section 405C Grant